Question 1

Fashion (with a capital F)

Accepted Answer

"While ‘dress’ is a human universal, ‘Fashion’ is a culturally-specific system of dress undergirded by a dominant economic system. The now ‘globalised’ Fashion system operates in line with the capitalist imperatives of growth and accumulation of profit." 
Sandra Niessen, Climate Words

Fashion Act Now capitalises the 'F' in Fashion to highlight that Fashion is a specific system of dress belonging to capitalism. It recognises that the word fashion has also be used to describe other dress systems and capitalising Fashion differentiates the word from other uses.

Question 2

Defashion

Accepted Answer

"While ‘dress’ is a human universal, ‘fashion’ is a culturally-specific system of dress undergirded by a dominant economic system. The now ‘globalized’ Fashion system operates in line with the capitalist imperatives of growth and accumulation of profit. As such, it wreaks profound harm and must be reduced by 75% – 95% to come within Earth’s carrying capacity (Fletcher and Tham 2019). Defashion is a grassroots emergency response to the industry’s inability to degrow. Defashion aims to dismantle the fashion system and replace it with a pluriverse of local, sustainable, historically and culturally relevant systems that honor values other than monetary (commons). Defashion puts wellbeing and the Planet first.
The neologism ‘defashion’ signals a paradigmatic shift towards a decolonial future in which fashion fairness goes far beyond concern for the plight of garment workers. In a defashion world, indigenous and non-fashion dress systems that have been erased by dominant, global fashion, are cherished."

Sandra Niessen, Climate Words.

Fashion Act Now is the originator of defashion, a provocative term that describes the role that Fashion must play in degrowth. Fashion Act Now wants to bring the concept of defashion into the mainstream discourse.

Defashion is a transition to post-fashion clothing systems that are regenerative, local, fair, nurturing and sufficient for the needs of communities.

Question 3

Post-fashion

Accepted Answer

"Post-Fashion denotes a future world in which the currently dominant Fashion system is dismantled. The Fashion system is unsustainable, growth-oriented and constructed to profit from the universal human need to dress. It is also a colonial throwback representing the proliferation (globalisation) of a Western system of dress to the detriment of all other systems of dress supported by different economic systems. It must be eclipsed.
Post-fashion implies that there are alternatives in place: a pluriverse of sustainable, clothing traditions. Some alternatives are already available in the form of indigenous systems. These require nurturing and must be provided with room to survive in the face of the current expanding Fashion system. Other alternatives need to be constructed in local, historically-grounded, culturally-relevant, earth-friendly ways. This will ensure the obsolescence of the current Fashion system. 
Post-Fashion is being spear-headed by activism. Initiatives like farm-to-fashion and fibershed(s) are leading the way."

Sandra Niessen, Climate Words

Question 4

Degrowth

Accepted Answer

"Degrowth is a planned reduction of energy and resource use designed to bring the economy back into balance with the living world in a way that reduces inequality and improves human well-being."

Jason Hickel
Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222 (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222)
​
“This ideology of economic growth has taken the role, almost, of religion in a secular era. Not only in the economy but us personally — each one of us, in our life and business, believe we should grow. Degrowth is a critique of this whole ideology.” 
Giorgos Kallis()

Question 5

Sacrifice zones & Fashion's sacrifice zones

Accepted Answer

"'Sacrifice: ‘destruction or surrender of something for the sake of something else’. The destruction represented by the tar sands of Alberta, for example, is deemed acceptable in exchange for energy and profit. The geographic framing of ‘sacrifice zones’ verges on the euphemistic because what is considered ‘acceptable’ depends on the relative power of the one doing the considering (the Cree people can never agree with the sacrifice of their heritage lands), and because the word ‘zones’ suggests only physical destruction. In the fashion world, ‘sacrifice zones’ are understood holistically, to also include e.g. cultural and psychological damage wreaked by the industry.
Sacrifice is inevitable when an economic system is based on exploitation. The Anthropocene, a designation that references massive alterations of the world due to human activity, raises the question of the extent to which humans will make Earth and future into sacrifice zones." Sandra Niessen, Climate Words
Fashion Act Now recognises that the globalised Fashion system exists through the use of sacrifice zones. It sacrifices the environment through unsustainable resource use and the dumping of waste (particularly in the global south). Sacrifice zones affect people connected to and living off their surrounding environments and impoverishes their natural wealth, forcing them to depend on wage labour to support their livelihoods. They are then forced into the capitalist system. But also, the spread of one mono-culture of clothing throughout the world sacrifices indigenous and sustainable local dress systems as it grows."

Nashir, MJA and Niessen, S. (2022), Uli’s Voice: From a Sacrifice Zone of Fashion. Indonesia: Fashion Act Now (FAN) https://youtu.be/qVLxga3TOsM

Niessen, Sandra, 2020. Fashion, its Sacrifice Zone, and Sustainability". In Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture 24:6.  pp. 859-877.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2020.1800984

Question 6

The commons

Accepted Answer

The Commons as described by David Bollier in The Commoner’s Catalog for Changemaking:
"A system of shared intention designed to steward collective care-wealth in fair, collaborative ways." 
"A socially coherent group of peers managing collective resources (both deportable and replenish able) with minimal reliance on the market or state.”
"Bottom up initiatives that prioritise meeting people’s needs over market exchange and capital accumulation. They stress the importance of stewarding the earth and its ecosystems, especially in contrast to market-based extraction.”

When discussing the economy, the state, the market and individuals are often considered to be the major human forces at play. Fashion Act Now consider that there is another powerful force at play that is often forgotten - the commons - groups of individuals that create their own rules on how to collaborate and share their collective wealth rather than relying on the market and state.

Question 7

The pluriverse

Accepted Answer

"A world where many worlds fit and all people’s worlds coexist with dignity & peace without being subject to diminishment, exploitation, misery."

Joy M. https://joycming.medium.com/visual-summary-of-pluriverse-a-post-development-dictionary-3d1c8d196611 (https://joycming.medium.com/visual-summary-of-pluriverse-a-post-development-dictionary-3d1c8d196611)

GLOSSARY, REFERENCES AND FAQ

Can’t find the answer you need?
Let us know...

Subscribe to our newsletter

GLOSSARY, REFERENCES AND FAQ

Can’t find the answer you need? Let us know...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Can’t find the answer you need?
Let us know...